Evolution of Glass as an Architectural Material

Glass is one of the oldest man made material used without interruption from its invention to this date. The exact period of glass history is unknown; however the oldest found date is 7000 B.C. in the Neolithic period. It was first used in Egypt for decorative objects before 3000 B.C. mainly as colored glaze on stone, pottery and beads but its use in windows appears to have been initiated by Romans.

During the seventeenth century the development of lead glass made a major step forward in enabling the manufacture of large glazing for windows, “a technology that brought glass into the history of architecture”. The rise of interest in greenhouses and conservatories in 1800 led to the mass marketing for use of glass in architecture. New types of buildings including exhibition halls, railway stations and other public buildings permitted for the design of large well lit spaces. Until 1851, glass was considered to be a luxury good, the conception which was gradually diminished during the industrial revolution due to increased availability of glass. Gradually iron and steel developments running parallel to glass made advancements in metal framing technology with the possibility of large glass expanses, thus making it an inseparable part of modern architecture.

Construction of the Crystal Palace in 1851, by Joseph Paxton in London marked the transformation of architecture’s traditional opaqueness by creating transparency through glass. He brought glass from the greenhouse to the architectural domain for the first time. To achieve uniformly lit interior space and using daylight as the only source of light was one of the major objectives for this project. Thus, in order to pacify the intense sunlight and glare created by this extreme transparency, translucent screens of calico were hung externally in-between the ridge beams of the roof glazing and covered the entire surface of the highly exposed horizontal section of the roof.

The concept of transparent wall arrived with Paxton’s Crystal palace and was carried forward as a glass curtain wall experiment in 1864 in Oriel Chambers, Liverpool by Peter Ellis. It demonstrated an exceptionally early use of curtain wall glazing and iron frame to maximize light, and minimize solid wall, and strongly influenced commercial architecture in North America. This inspiration could be seen in Willis Polk’s Hallidie office building in San Francisco (1918) considered as the first curtain wall building in United States. However, this building is not considered very comfortable on sunny days due to south facing glass facade.

Architects were increasingly fascinated by the notion of transparent, all-glass buildings. In the first half of twentieth century, Chicago architects were constructing America’s first high-rise glazed buildings, while in 1922, Germany’s Ludwig Mies van der Rohe envisioned and crafted models of hypothetical 20 and 30 story skyscrapers clad totally in glass which resembles buildings currently being constructed today. It wasn’t until the middle of the last century that technology allowed for the construction of multi-story glass facades such as those on Bunshaft’s Lever House and Mies van der Rohe’s Seagram Building, and the many other glass skyscrapers that comprise the Manhattan skyline.

References:

1.     Buters, F. (2005). Glass architecture: is it sustainable? International Conference “Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment”, Santorini, Greece.

2.     Carmody, J., Selkowitz S., Lee, L., Arasteh, D., Willmert, T. (2004). Window Systems for High-Performance Buildings. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

3.     Elkadi, H. (2006). Cultures of Glass Architecture. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

4.     Roger Mears Architects Publication. Historic guide to glazing. London: Planning Department of the London Borough of Islington.

5.     Schoenefeldt, H. (2008). The Crystal Palace, environmentally considered. Architecture research quarterly, 12, 283-294. Cambridge University Press.

6.     Thomas, L. (2008). “As Large as the Situation of the Columns Would Allow” Building Cladding and Plate Glass in the Chicago Skyscraper, 1885–1905. Technology and Culture. 49 (2), 399-419.

Branding for our architectural firm – Defining brand, naming and logo design.

We have read it, heard it and seen it numerous times –
a powerful brand tells your story!

Defining brand is a challenging task so we decided to approach it as a design project. When we talk about brand, we are not referring to it as logo, business card or letterhead, ofcourse those are parts of it – what we really mean is – what does your business stand for? Defining our brand was the first thing we did even before naming our firm. It was necessary to answer few crucial questions to get comprehensive understanding of our brand –

What’s the narrative?
What makes us unusual?
What needs are we fulfilling?
Whose problem are we solving?
What would be the tagline?

After we could find an optimum answer to all these questions we were able to define ourselves as an architectural firm with international working and collaboration experience, progressive mindset and specialized knowledge in urban design, sustainable design and BIM. BIM will definitely be our USP. It is going to be an intrinsic part of our work culture through which we can achieve higher efficiency, better coordinated documents and collaborative working resulting in significant time and cost savings. Moreover we can provide our clients with interactive design experience in the form of virtual 3D models right from the conceptual stage of design which can help them in understanding and visualizing their projects from very beginning. Knowing our strengths, expertise and competencies helped us derive the services we will provide as an architectural firm – Architectural Design, Urban Design, Sustainable Design, Interior Design, BIM services and Collaboration.

Once we were able to define our brand, we arrived at the most interesting part which was naming our firm. All the brainstorming we did for naming really didn’t help us as we were just not satisfied with any of the names we came up with. Putting our creative minds at work, we then thought of taking first letter of all the services, values and expertise of our architectural practice (mentioned below) and put it through a word generator app to see what it gives us.

Architecture, Urban design, Sustainability, Interior design, BIM, Design Excellence,
Performance driven design, Parametric design, Computational Design, Energy efficiency, Optimization, Integration, Collaboration, Technical Expertise

It showed up hundreds of pages with results of many words – some that made no sense and few that were funny. We kept scrolling through the pages until we saw the word that we liked instantly ‘Iceboat’. It sounded unique, trendy and cool. But above all ‘Iceboat’ included a little part of all the things that we are doing at our firm.

We later modified the acronym ‘Iceboat’ into a graphic below to depict the services that we provide at Iceboat Studio.

Next in line was logo design. We always wanted our company logo to be simple, subtle and clean, the one that can leave a strong impression. To accomplish this we created a logo that is simple text which is subtly accented by exponentiation symbol. This subtle twist was achieved by adding communicative value to letter ‘A’ by replacing it with exponent symbol ‘^’, which in mathematical terms means ‘a quantity representing the power to which a given number or expression is to be raised’. This symbol in our logo is used to depict the added value in architectural services that we provide to our clients. The red color symbolizes energy and passion that we put into creativity and innovation.

We all have a story to share. Our first blog was a perfect opportunity for us to share ours. In coming days we plan to write series of blog posts for our readers. The topics we plan to cover are BIM, best practices in architecture, technology and architecture, architectural entrepreneurship, developments within our company and a lot more. The next in the series is going to be ‘BIM (Building Information Modeling) Vs CAD (Computer Aided Design)’. Stay tuned!

 

BIM awareness series

In recent years, the adoption of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the AEC industry has been accelerating worldwide. All countries adopting BIM are commonly recognizing the limitations of the existing CAD, and noting the potential of BIM to bring a paradigm shift – similar to what CAD initially brought. Over the past decade the construction sector in the developed world has adopted BIM in a big way. Countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, and Australia have mandated the usage of BIM in public sector. The degree of awareness and acceptance of BIM in emerging economies such as India however is still in its nascent stage.

BIM has the potential to provide significant benefits to Indian AEC industry. Considering the high volume of real estate and infrastructure construction activity India is witnessing, BIM, if deployed appropriately, can provide significant savings, enhance the quality of the built environment that gets delivered and allow the industry to make expected contributions to the growth of the country. The lack of practical knowledge and limited understanding regarding BIM is one of the many challenges for BIM adoption in India. Through the series of upcoming blog posts we aspire to increase the local BIM awareness.

 

Part 1 – BIM (Building Information Modeling) Vs CAD (Computer Aided Design)

When the concept of BIM is introduced to beginners for first time, it is almost always followed by BIM vs CAD discussion. By addressing the basic questions regarding BIM & CAD, this article aims to provide basic understanding regarding the subject in this context.

What distinguishes BIM-based systems from CAD-based systems?

CAD is based on 2D drawing elements and is a fragmented process of multiple files. CAD has evolved to 3D, however, the 3D models produced by CAD are graphical entities only and have no intelligence at the object level and cannot support data integration and design analysis.

BIM involves modeling in 3D with intelligent data parameters being assigned to individual entities. It is a database of information about a building for design, validation, construction and lifecycle maintenance; not just construction documents. BIM is virtual construction that is analytical and quantifiable.

 

In a traditional CAD-based workflow, each view is drawn separately with no inherent relationship between drawings. In this type of production environment, the team creates plans, sections, elevations, schedules, and perspectives and must coordinate any changes between files manually.

 

In a BIM-based workflow, the team creates a 3D parametric model and uses this model to generate the drawings necessary for documentation. Plans, sections, elevations, schedules, and perspectives are all by-products of creating a building information model.

What exactly is BIM?

BIM, or Building Information Modeling is the act of creating a virtual model of a facility for the purpose of visualization, engineering analysis, conflict analysis, code criteria checking, cost engineering, as-built product, budgeting and many other purposes. It is a process that enhances collaboration resulting in improved information management and an overall leaner process. To sum it up, BIM is a modeling technology and associated set of processes to produce, communicate and analyze building model.

What softwares can be used for BIM?

Under the BIM umbrella, there are many software applications that lead to an efficient design of a space. Autodesk Revit is one such application which has the ability to parametrically capture design intent and facilitate model creation. Some BIM softwares are designed to perform certain functions which Revit either has minimal functionality to do, or, cannot do at all. However, revit model can be integrated with such softwares to facilitate this functionality. For example, applications like Ecotect, Green Building Studio and IES VE which are designed to test the efficiency of a design with regards to the environments impact on it and its impact on the environment. Navisworks, another BIM application, brings building information models from various disciplines together in a single environment to see how they physically interact allowing designers to analyze clash detection. Apart from above mentioned tools other BIM applications are ArchiCAD, Vectorworks, Bentley Systems to name a few.

How is Revit different from AutoCAD?

AutoCAD can assist in producing 2D drawings and AutoCAD-based projects are typically set up by having individual files representing individual drawing-types (i.e. plans, sections and elevations). In Revit, you create a single virtual 3D model of your project. It allows you to view this model in a variety of ways including: floor plans, elevations, sections, ceiling plans, details, 3D views and schedules. Further, you can edit the model from any view and changes automatically appear in all other views. Since there is a single model that is simply displayed as a plan, elevation, section, schedule or 3D a change to one view is a change to all. Views cannot get out of synch. By itself, this feature alone can be enough to justify using Revit over more traditional approaches where there are dozens of disconnected drawings that represent same portions of the project and must be manually coordinated.

How does interoperability between Revit and AutoCAD works?

The design and construction of a building is a team activity. Each activity and each type of specialty is supported and augmented by its own computer applications. Interoperability is the ability to pass data between applications, and for multiple applications to jointly contribute to the work at hand. Interoperability between Revit and AutoCAD is very simple and user friendly. It is possible to import 2D AutoCAD dwgs into Revit and create a 3D model out of it or use them for coordination purpose. Also Revit views can be easily exported to AutoCAD in cases where consultants do not use Revit and need drawing files in 2D format. However, it is always highly recommended to have all consultants work in revit to ensure accuracy of coordination, optimized project results and greater efficiency of design team.

 

Now that we know this..what’s next?

The next in series is ‘Benefits of BIM to Owners’. We will dive into details of how the facility owners can achieve better performing buildings and reliable delivery process by utilizing BIM resulting in significant time and cost savings.

 

References:

  1. Chuck, E., Paul, T., Rafael, S., Kathleen, L. (2011). BIM Handbook A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. John Wiley & Son.
  2. James, V., Eddy, K. and Brendan, D. (2015). Mastering Autodesk Revit Architecture 2016: Autodesk Official Press.
  3. Computer Integrated Construction Research Program. (2013). “BIM Planning Guide for Facility Owners”. Version 2.0, June, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Available at http://bim.psu.edu.
  4. Mohammed, A., Anil S. Special Issue on Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Developing Countries. International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling, 2(3), iv-v, July-September 2013.
  5. Cheng, J.C. and Lu, Q. (2015). A review of the efforts and roles of the public sector for BIM adoption worldwide. ITcon, Vol. 20, pg. 442-478.
  6. Anil S. State of BIM Adoption and Outlook in India. RICS Research 2014. RICS School of Built Environment, Amity University.
  7. http://bimuzer.com/2011/03/18/how-to-talk-about-bimrevit-without-knowing-that-much-about-bimrevit/